Infiniti FX50: The station wagon reinvented
Launches are a huge deal in the auto business. If the right message does not get out when a new model goes on sale, there is seldom a second chance.
Nobody understands that better than Infiniti, Nissan’s luxury brand (NSANY). The brand launched in the shadow of Toyota’s Lexus (TM) in 1989 with an ill-conceived “rocks and trees” advertising campaign and never really recovered. Today, Lexus is the most popular luxury brand in the United States, while Infiniti sells less than half as many vehicles. So low is Infiniti’s public profile that it discontinued its Q45 flagship a year ago — and nobody noticed.
The 2009 FX50 won’t boost Infiniti’s sales figures much – only 134 units of its predecessor model, the FX45, have been sold through May — but it should raise its visibility. It is truly exotic in its conception and execution; in many ways it is the most revolutionary mass-production vehicle of past five years. When former BMW CEO Helmut Panke went searching for new ideas for the German car company, he often cited the FX as a source of inspiration.
Think of the FX as the Toontown version of the modern station wagon: it has seating for four, with storage space behind the back seat, and a low roof with a barely functional roof rack on top. The cartoon inspiration comes from the proportions: An exaggeratedly long nose coupled to a passenger compartment that, instead of being squared off at the rear, is tucked into a dramatically-bobbed tail. The FX has perhaps the shortest rear overhang of any car on the road – its curved shape is reminiscent of some classic French cars from the 1930s. Completing the effect are some baroque styling elements – extreme cat’s eye headlamps, open-mouthed grill, Wurlitzer-inspired fender vents – and the absurdly oversized wheels.
Under the skin, the FX50 is a rolling test-bed of technology. Two of the highlights are the around-view monitor, introduced a year ago, which gives a 360-degree view around the car from four cameras, and lane departure prevention. While other Infinitis merely send out beeps to warn the driver when he strays out of a lane, the FX50 gently applies its brakes to nudge him back in.
During more than 200 miles of driving this extroverted vehicle, all that technology took some getting used to. When I pulled out to pass, for instance, the lane departure prevention system momentarily tried to hold me back. But I immediately warmed to the more traditional elements of the car — the seats, controls, and interior appointments — which were executed with uncommon skill.
There is a price to be paid for all of this, of course, and it’s steep: a base price of $56,700 plus a $815 destination charge; $69,145 with many bells and whistles. Should you decide to buy one, plan on spending a lot of time explaining to yourself and others why you did. Unlike a vehicle in a more conventional package that carries a recognizable brand, the Infiniti FX50 doesn’t make a predictable statement about itself or its owner. And therein lies its charm.
the honda pilot is hardly a comparison to the Infiniti FX… their target markets are no where near eachother.
try the Porsche Cayenne or the BMW X6.
if you want to talk mileage compare the CRV with the Nissan Roque or the Pilot with the Murano and/or Pathfinder.
the funny thing is, a week ago i was defending the Pilot because someone was complaining that the mileage wasn’t very good.
With fuel prices heading towards $5.00 per Galloon one would think that a 5.0 liter 390 HP crossover would be a slow mover. The Honda Pilot gets much better fuel economy and the price is much less. Honda has done a much better job compared to Nissan at achieving clean fuel efficient vehicles.
This absurd FX50 soon will go the way as the absurd Q45.
If you can afford to buy the 09 FX you can afford to put gas in it. And by the way the new FX actually gets better gas mileage then the previous generation.
obvious he likes it because it gets the worse MPG out of any of the cars he reviews. His Mini review is total wrong.
i have an FX45 for about 4 years now. my commutes are from 30-45 miles each way and usually have about 30-50% stop and go traffic. with that i average 17.8 MPG. several days i did the same commute and when it was finally moving, i stayed at 60MPH and averaged 22 MPG.
I was hoping to get an FX45 but with the gas price, I think I ended up not buying it.
Good luck to whoever going to buy it.
Wait! Wait! Did Taylor like a vehicle!
It’s a Miracle!
There is a reason you see so few FX45’s on the street, the gas mileage will have you seriouslyy contemplating suicide. I looked at one 4 years ago and bought a Mazda 3 instead. I know there is no way you can compare the two vehicles, there’s a $30K price difference, but the Mazda is a lot of fun and I don’t find myself reaching for sharp implements when I fill up the tank. The FX50’s estimated city mileage is 14. With a fill up costing almost $100 I can’t see this latest SUV/SAV/cross over/weird thing selling many more units than it’s predecessor.
- The practical Porsche: 2010 Panamera Turbo
- A Ford for the future: 2010 Transit Connect
- Techno Toyota: 2010 Prius
- Melancholy Mercedes: Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren
- Lusty Lincoln: 2010 MKT
- Athletic Acura: 2010 TL SH-AWD
- Red Runner: 2010 Mercedes-Benz E550 Coupe
- Boomers’ Buick: 2010 LaCrosse CXL
- Slick Subie: 2010 Subaru Legacy 2.5i Limited
- Capable Chevy: 2010 Equinox AWD
- The Dodge Challenger is symtomatic ab... More
- You were testing a Dodge 'Laramie'.... More
- A little honesty in the CR 'survey' p... More
- Steve in NY, the european versions of... More
- I'd hardly say that the Honda FCX has... More
- I am not sure I agree with the assert... More
- Hydrogen power isn't the "Holy Grail"... More
- The Honda Clarity makes me wish the U... More
- The Flex is a knock of the Scion Xb. ... More
- I recently traded my Large SUV for th... More



Pathfinder is the only vehicle that even comes close in size. $60K for the Infiniti or $40K for a fully equipped high tech Pilot Touring with DVD and NAV. The 20K savings in the bank will come in handy when the kids reach college age. As far as the other Nissan vehicles are concerned, let’s deal with the larger the Nissan Pathfinder. The Pilot gets 10% better fuel economy. It has a fuel efficient 3.5 liter clean v6 opposed to the 4.0 liter Nissan power plant. The Pilot is a much larger vehicle with more headroom, more second and third row head room. The pilot is a 2009 the Pathfinder is a 2008. The Honda has a lower five year maintenance cost by $664.00. Also Honda charges less to get the truck to you destination is $75.00 less. Judging by Honda’s sales in June 2008 it is clear who people are choosing for their transportation needs. Honda has the cleanest cars in America. It’s time to save money, save fuel and dive a green vehicle.