2009 Lincoln MKS: Sub-luxury brand, sub-luxury price
Dating exactly when Lincoln fell out of the luxury-car category is difficult – but fun.
You could start with the 1977 Versailles, a version of the Ford Grenada that was started up with a vinyl roof and bumper-mounted spare tire. Or maybe it was those short-lived pickup trucks, the Blackwood and the Mark LT, that staggered under the Lincoln star and excessive sticker prices.
My personal answer to the question ‘”What killed Lincoln?” is the corporate reorganization in the 1990s under CEO Jac Nasser that led to the Premier Automotive Group. A slug of money was allotted to Lincoln so that it could develop an exclusive large sedan, known internally as “The Flagship,” to relaunch the brand. But a recession arrived before “The Flagshp” did, and Lincoln was reduced to marketing knockoffs of Ford (F) division models like the Fusion and Edge. Their heritage was little disguised by Lincoln’s decision to adopt Euro-style nameplates like MKZ and MKX.
All that zigging and zagging has produced a predictable effect on sales. Today rival Cadillac (GM) is outselling Lincoln handily, with about three Caddys sold for every two Lincolns.
While Ford shows no interest in trying to hoist Lincoln up to luxury status again with exclusive models or pioneering technology, it is becoming more clever at “badge engineering:” spinning Lincolns out of Fords.
Case in point: the 2009 MKS, which bears almost no resemblance to the homely Ford Taurus (nee Five Hundred) from which it sprung. The high rear-deck, sleek profile and in-your-face front grille on my Sangria Red test car drew a surprising number of thumbs-up from passersby during a drive from New York City to the Massachusetts Berkshires. The interior was just as handsome, with its finely-detailed instrument panel, sophisticated graphics, and leather and wood steering wheel.
The MKS can’t completely escape its humble origins. It is powered by a 3.7 liter version of the V6 Duratec that resides in the Taurus (and produces a mediocre 17 miles per gallon city, 24 mpg highway). But the test car came loaded with standard equipment, and even with special wheels, a rear-view camera, and a navigation system, it stickered out at just $42,605 – a good value in my eyes.
Lincoln’s future direction became clearer recently with the announcement that the Mercury brand would be shifted to smaller cars. That will allow Lincoln to occupy Mercury’s old price point: above popular-priced Fords, but below true luxury levels.
Lincoln, in other words, is becoming Ford’s equivalent of Buick, albeit with glitzier pretensions.
Ford is unjustly criticized for using shared platforms. The Lincoln Versailes/Ford Granada reference fails to mention the fact that the Seville at that time was built on the Chevy Nova chassis. Lexus vehicles have long been obvious upscale versions of Toyotas built on the same platform. The media just can’t give American car manufacturers a break!
I just can’t agree with your “good value”. $42.6k for a re-skinned Taurus with an over-bored engine that gets poor gas milage. Not exactly exciting.
Until I can get a Lincoln that is substantially different than a Ford and not pay a fortune for the badge, I won’t even be looking.
THE TAURUS IS POWERED BY A 3.5 L
LINCOLN 3.7 L
How good is your review if the information presented is inaccurate!
2008 Ford Taurus – 3.5-Liter Duratec, 60-Degree V6, 24-Valve, DOHC, SEFI Engine; Front Mounted With Horsepower Of 263@6251, Torque Of 249@4501, Alloy Block and Alloy Cylinder Heads (Standard)
2009 lincoln MKS – 3.7-Liter Duratec, V6, 24-Valve, DOHC, SEFI Engine; Front/Longitudinal Mounted With Horsepower Of 273@6250, Torque Of 270@4250, Alloy Block and Alloy Cylinder Heads (Standard)
Verify your facts before making comments!!
The Taurus has a 3.5L motor not the 3.7L as noted above.
The 3.7L engine does not appear to be offered in the Taurus.
How different is the Ford/Lincoln strategy from the Toyota/Lexus strategy of reusing platforms?
The MKS has an Exclusive 3.7L motor that Fords don’t get.
The MSK is a BIG car, and gets pretty decent FE for such a large car. And it DOESN’T mandate premium fuel. That is better than 1mpg more from an expense stand point.
- Carry-all Cadillacs: 2010 SRX and 2010 CTS Sport Wagon
- Innovative Audi: 2009 Q5 3.2 quattro Tiptronic
- Bankruptcy Baby: 2010 Chevrolet Camaro coupe
- Korean Kutie: 2010 Kia Soul Plus
- Vulnerable Volvo: 2010 XC60
- Endangered Cadillac: 2009 CTS-V Series
- Zensational: 2009 Nissan 370Z
- Britain’s Best: 2009 Bentley Continental GT Speed
- Hybrid Hoopla: 2010 Honda Insight
- Ford’s future? 2010 Fusion Hybrid
- The Dodge Challenger is symtomatic ab... More
- You were testing a Dodge 'Laramie'.... More
- A little honesty in the CR 'survey' p... More
- Steve in NY, the european versions of... More
- I'd hardly say that the Honda FCX has... More
- I am not sure I agree with the assert... More
- Hydrogen power isn't the "Holy Grail"... More
- The Honda Clarity makes me wish the U... More
- The Flex is a knock of the Scion Xb. ... More
- I recently traded my Large SUV for th... More





Hmmm… Good value huh? A 2009 Hyundai Genesis is just under that 42,600 price tag with better performance (V8), and better warranty. Mr. Taylor’s conclusion should have been Lincoln’s/Fords downfall is more as result of a poor business model.