<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009 Lincoln MKS: Sub-luxury brand, sub-luxury price</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thewheeldeal.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/08/07/2009-lincoln-mks-sub-luxury-brand-sub-luxury-price/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thewheeldeal.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/08/07/2009-lincoln-mks-sub-luxury-brand-sub-luxury-price/</link>
	<description>It&#039;s all about the product, by Fortune senior editor Alex Taylor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:56:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: RC Roberts Chesapeake, Va</title>
		<link>http://thewheeldeal.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/08/07/2009-lincoln-mks-sub-luxury-brand-sub-luxury-price/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>RC Roberts Chesapeake, Va</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 12:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortunewheeldeal.wordpress.com/?p=102#comment-173</guid>
		<description>Hmmm... Good value huh?  A 2009 Hyundai Genesis is just under that 42,600 price tag with better performance (V8), and better warranty.  Mr. Taylor&#039;s conclusion should have been Lincoln&#039;s/Fords downfall is more as result of a poor business model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230; Good value huh?  A 2009 Hyundai Genesis is just under that 42,600 price tag with better performance (V8), and better warranty.  Mr. Taylor&#8217;s conclusion should have been Lincoln&#8217;s/Fords downfall is more as result of a poor business model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim, Stockton, NJ</title>
		<link>http://thewheeldeal.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/08/07/2009-lincoln-mks-sub-luxury-brand-sub-luxury-price/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim, Stockton, NJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortunewheeldeal.wordpress.com/?p=102#comment-172</guid>
		<description>Ford is unjustly criticized for using shared platforms. The Lincoln Versailes/Ford Granada reference fails to mention the fact that the Seville at that time was built on the Chevy Nova chassis. Lexus vehicles have long been obvious upscale versions of Toyotas built on the same platform. The media just can&#039;t give American car manufacturers a break!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ford is unjustly criticized for using shared platforms. The Lincoln Versailes/Ford Granada reference fails to mention the fact that the Seville at that time was built on the Chevy Nova chassis. Lexus vehicles have long been obvious upscale versions of Toyotas built on the same platform. The media just can&#8217;t give American car manufacturers a break!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JAy., Houston, TX</title>
		<link>http://thewheeldeal.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/08/07/2009-lincoln-mks-sub-luxury-brand-sub-luxury-price/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>JAy., Houston, TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 21:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortunewheeldeal.wordpress.com/?p=102#comment-170</guid>
		<description>I just can&#039;t agree with your &quot;good value&quot;.  $42.6k for a re-skinned Taurus with an over-bored engine that gets poor gas milage.  Not exactly exciting.

Until I can get a Lincoln that is substantially different than a Ford and not pay a fortune for the badge, I won&#039;t even be looking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just can&#8217;t agree with your &#8220;good value&#8221;.  $42.6k for a re-skinned Taurus with an over-bored engine that gets poor gas milage.  Not exactly exciting.</p>
<p>Until I can get a Lincoln that is substantially different than a Ford and not pay a fortune for the badge, I won&#8217;t even be looking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BOB JOHNSON CHICAGO IL</title>
		<link>http://thewheeldeal.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/08/07/2009-lincoln-mks-sub-luxury-brand-sub-luxury-price/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>BOB JOHNSON CHICAGO IL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 18:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortunewheeldeal.wordpress.com/?p=102#comment-168</guid>
		<description>THE TAURUS IS POWERED BY A 3.5 L
 LINCOLN 3.7 L</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THE TAURUS IS POWERED BY A 3.5 L<br />
 LINCOLN 3.7 L</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ford Veteran, Cleveland, Ohio</title>
		<link>http://thewheeldeal.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/08/07/2009-lincoln-mks-sub-luxury-brand-sub-luxury-price/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Ford Veteran, Cleveland, Ohio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 17:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortunewheeldeal.wordpress.com/?p=102#comment-167</guid>
		<description>How good is your review if the information presented is inaccurate!

2008 Ford Taurus - 3.5-Liter Duratec, 60-Degree V6, 24-Valve, DOHC, SEFI Engine; Front Mounted With Horsepower Of 263@6251, Torque Of 249@4501, Alloy Block and Alloy Cylinder Heads (Standard)

2009 lincoln MKS - 3.7-Liter Duratec, V6, 24-Valve, DOHC, SEFI Engine; Front/Longitudinal Mounted With Horsepower Of 273@6250, Torque Of 270@4250, Alloy Block and Alloy Cylinder Heads (Standard)

Verify your facts before making comments!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How good is your review if the information presented is inaccurate!</p>
<p>2008 Ford Taurus &#8211; 3.5-Liter Duratec, 60-Degree V6, 24-Valve, DOHC, SEFI Engine; Front Mounted With Horsepower Of 263@6251, Torque Of 249@4501, Alloy Block and Alloy Cylinder Heads (Standard)</p>
<p>2009 lincoln MKS &#8211; 3.7-Liter Duratec, V6, 24-Valve, DOHC, SEFI Engine; Front/Longitudinal Mounted With Horsepower Of 273@6250, Torque Of 270@4250, Alloy Block and Alloy Cylinder Heads (Standard)</p>
<p>Verify your facts before making comments!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick, Des Moines IA</title>
		<link>http://thewheeldeal.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/08/07/2009-lincoln-mks-sub-luxury-brand-sub-luxury-price/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick, Des Moines IA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortunewheeldeal.wordpress.com/?p=102#comment-163</guid>
		<description>The Taurus has a 3.5L motor not the 3.7L as noted above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Taurus has a 3.5L motor not the 3.7L as noted above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian, Dearborn MI</title>
		<link>http://thewheeldeal.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/08/07/2009-lincoln-mks-sub-luxury-brand-sub-luxury-price/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian, Dearborn MI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortunewheeldeal.wordpress.com/?p=102#comment-160</guid>
		<description>The 3.7L engine does not appear to be offered in the Taurus.

How different is the Ford/Lincoln strategy from the Toyota/Lexus strategy of reusing platforms?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 3.7L engine does not appear to be offered in the Taurus.</p>
<p>How different is the Ford/Lincoln strategy from the Toyota/Lexus strategy of reusing platforms?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck, Dearborn MI</title>
		<link>http://thewheeldeal.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/08/07/2009-lincoln-mks-sub-luxury-brand-sub-luxury-price/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck, Dearborn MI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortunewheeldeal.wordpress.com/?p=102#comment-157</guid>
		<description>The MKS has an Exclusive 3.7L motor that Fords don&#039;t get.

The MSK is a BIG car, and gets pretty decent FE for such a large car.  And it DOESN&#039;T mandate premium fuel.  That is better than 1mpg more from an expense stand point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The MKS has an Exclusive 3.7L motor that Fords don&#8217;t get.</p>
<p>The MSK is a BIG car, and gets pretty decent FE for such a large car.  And it DOESN&#8217;T mandate premium fuel.  That is better than 1mpg more from an expense stand point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
