Upheaval in the ranks: Malibu aces midsize car quality
Model-line quality data compiled by JD Power and Associates finds its way into the media only rarely because the California survey firm guards it to avoid embarrassing clients.
So when Power’s 2008 Initial Quality numbers for midsize cars leaked recently, they warranted some further scrutiny. And parsing the numbers reveals some surprising developments
First, some background: For years, Power has been measuring the quality of cars after 90 days of ownership by surveying their owners. Everything counts the same: A malfunctioning ashtray is tabulated with the same weight as a seized engine. In the last couple of years, Power has been subdividing the complaints into design problems and defects/malfunctions but the totals remain comparable with previous years – and carries enormous bragging rights.
As long as I can remember, Japanese manufacturers have been regarded as the gold standard in quality. No more. This year’s IQS winner in the midsize segment, by a healthy margin, is the Chevrolet Malibu, with a mere 80 problems per 100 customers. That’s an excellent showing for a car in its first year of production, when assembly plants are still learning how to put the pieces together.
Other non-Asians also did well. The Ford Fusion finished third with 88 problems, the Volkswagen Passat ranked fourth with 94, and the Buick LaCrosse came in fifth with 96. Buick traditionally scores well in these surveys, but Ford and VW are both moving up the charts.
To be sure, two Japanese models, the Mitsubishi Galant and Toyota Camry also finished in the top five. But the Nissan Altima finished below average, as did, shockingly, the Honda Accord. Nissan is typically an also-ran in quality, but Honda has been a leader in the past. The 2008 Accord – another model in its first year of production – fell all the way from second in last year’s midsize survey with 22 more defects per 100.
Bringing up the rear in the midsize quality ranks was the Subaru Outback Wagon – another historical also-ran – and two Chrysler products: the Dodge Avenger and the mechanically identical Chrysler Sebring. They recorded 171 and 183 defects respectively, more than twice as many as the Malibu.
A couple of conclusions can be drawn from this data. One, it is possible for American mass-producers to equal or better the quality of their overseas competitors. And two, it still makes sense to avoid purchasing a car during its first year of production – even though that car may carry a famous Asian name on the trunk lid.
I never consider the JD Power ratings when buying a car because they focus on a very short time frame when the car is basically new. My focus point on quality is how good the car is when it is five years old or more. By that standard, most cars from GM and Ford still don’t compare well with Toyota or Honda.
- Eco-villain: 2010 Land Rover LR4
- The practical Porsche: 2010 Panamera Turbo
- A Ford for the future: 2010 Transit Connect
- Techno Toyota: 2010 Prius
- Melancholy Mercedes: Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren
- Lusty Lincoln: 2010 MKT
- Athletic Acura: 2010 TL SH-AWD
- Red Runner: 2010 Mercedes-Benz E550 Coupe
- Boomers’ Buick: 2010 LaCrosse CXL
- Slick Subie: 2010 Subaru Legacy 2.5i Limited
- The Dodge Challenger is symtomatic ab... More
- You were testing a Dodge 'Laramie'.... More
- A little honesty in the CR 'survey' p... More
- Steve in NY, the european versions of... More
- I'd hardly say that the Honda FCX has... More
- I am not sure I agree with the assert... More
- Hydrogen power isn't the "Holy Grail"... More
- The Honda Clarity makes me wish the U... More
- The Flex is a knock of the Scion Xb. ... More
- I recently traded my Large SUV for th... More



American publications seem to favor American auto producers. I regard JD Powers not highly and view their surveys with suspicion.